A community-oriented approach with a progressive editorial stance, striving for transparency and encouraging readers to consider multiple perspectives.

Tuesday, July 8, 2025
booked.netCall us at 613-935-3763
Eco-conscious : Print an issue, plant a tree! 

No products in the cart.

  • About
    • Contributors
    • Disclaimers
    • Terms & Conditions
    • Giving back
    • Mission Statement
    • Past Issues
    • Where to Find
    • Call us at 613-935-3763
The Seeker - Positively Local, Suporting Local
  • Home
  • News
  • The Soapbox
  • Columnists
  • Events
  • Advertise!
    • Online
    • In Print
  • Puzzles
  • Videos
Seeker
No Result
View All Result

LTE – Charity Intelligence Fails: Why Canada Needs a New Charity Watchdog

A Reader by A Reader
November 16, 2022
in The Soapbox
Reading Time: 5 mins read
0
man love people woman

Photo by RODNAE Productions on Pexels.com

Canadians are generous donors to charity, with over 84% making at least one donation a year for a total of over $10.6 billion in 2021. But with over 86,000 registered charities operating in the country, trying to decide where donations will have the most impact can be daunting.

You might also like

LTE: Starving local news and awarding billionaires with huge tax breaks isn’t okay

LTE: Roll on Democracy!

LTE: Electoral Reform

One organization that tries to provide guidance to donors in making informed decisions is Charity Intelligence. Its stated mission is “to provide Canadian donors with information that helps them make informed and intelligent giving decisions to have the greatest impact.”

Unfortunately, Charity Intelligence (CI) has failed miserably in carrying out its mission due its questionable assessment model, an inadequate governance structure and its principals being more interested in raising their media profile than carrying out unbiased analysis.

Since its launch in 2006, experts in the charitable and non-profit sector have questioned CI’s rating methodology, which relies almost exclusively on examining financial data. Charity law expert Mark Blumberg says that system of analysis is lacking, arguing “financial statements only cover 20-30% of the important information that a charity should disclose because it does not usually reflect volunteer contributions, impact, programs, etc. An audited financial statement only provides an general overview of the financial information.”

An article in Charity Village (“Charity Intelligence, Transparent on Transparency?”) cited non-profit sector experts critical of the organization’s methodology, stating the model results in “naïve analysis of data and lack of knowledge of CRA guidelines and how non-profits in Canada actually work.”

Beyond its flawed methodology, Ci and its tiny staff are simply not qualified to conduct legitimate analysis. None of the organization’s three full time employees, including Managing Director and public face of the organization, Kate Bahen, are professional auditors or Chartered Professional Accountants. Yet somehow, this small, underqualified group has posted assessments of over 780 organizations.

Despite being a self-appointed watchdog of the charitable sector, as a registered charity itself, Ci’s own governance standards are highly questionable. Two of their three full-time employees, Bahen and Director of Research Greg Thompson, are members of Ci’s three-person Board of Directors.

This double duty as employee and board member completely contradicts widely accepted best practices for governance in the non-profit sector. Nevertheless, Ci gives itself an overall rating of five stars out of five on its own website. This, despite the fact that the organization briefly had its own charitable status revoked by Revenue Canada in 2012, for failing to file its annual returns.

Ci’s work may also be influenced by a political bias according to journalist and author, Mark Bourrie, who pointed out that both founder Kate Bahen and CI board chair Graeme Hepburn are donors to the Conservative Party. Elections Canada data shows that Hepburn alone has made 53 separate donations to the Conservative Party/candidates to the tune of over $34,000, and once hosted a fundraiser for former Ontario Conservative leader, Tim Hudak.

There’s no law preventing such contributions, but Ci and Bahen’s biases were made abundantly clear in 2020 when they gleefully piled-on to the Conservative Party’s attacks against WE Charity for agreeing to administer the Liberal government’s Canadians Student Service Grant (CSSG).

From June to December 2020, Ci/Bahen, appeared in 698 print and online articles, 356 television reports, and 659 radio reports—all to talk about WE Charity, ME to WE, WE Charity founders Marc and Craig Kielburger, and the CSSG.

Attacking charities, despite its stated commitment “to always be respectful of Canadian charities, to respect their decisions and recognize the challenges they face,” is nothing new for Ci. In 2019, Bahen accused the True North Foundation – the charitable foundation affiliated with the Winnipeg Jets hockey team – of overspending on fundraising and excessive administration costs, and bizarrely called the organization a “puck hog” in a TV interview.

Bahen eventually apologized (“Charity Intelligence Canada issues apology to the True North Youth Foundation”) stating, “I want to unreservedly and unequivocally apologize for my unfortunate mischaracterization of True North Youth Foundation Inc. (TNYF) that was aired in the media.”

With a questionable rating system, less than qualified analysts and a suspect governance model, Canadian donors should be wary of Ci’s assessments of other charities. As Liberal MP Francesco Sorbara said to Bahen at an Ethics Committee hearing related to the CSSG, “You (CI) only have two or three people working there as your staff. There are a lot of charities in Canada and many people will go your site to get your views. Where’s the due diligence on your side on the quality of the research you’re putting out?”

Indeed, as giving season approaches, Canadian donors would be wise to take advantage of organizations with a less biased and performative track record than Ci, like www.canadahelps.org. Or they could review annual ratings from outlets like MacLean’s, and follow the tips here to know what to look for in evaluating a charity on their own.

A Reader
Cornwall, Ontario

A Reader

A Reader

Are you passionate about something happening in our community? Do you have thoughts or opinions you'd like to share? We invite you to send your letters to the editor to [email protected] on any topic that matters to you. Whether it's local news, social issues, or a story that touched your heart, we want to hear from you! Your voice matters, and your perspective can make a difference. Reach out and be part of the conversation—send your letters today!

Next Post
The annual Focus Art Juried Fall Art Exhibition is back for another year featuring the work of 39 different artists from the region.

The annual Focus Art Juried Fall Art Exhibition is back for another year featuring the work of 39 different artists from the region.

Categories

  • Business & Finances (15)
  • Columns (636)
    • Archived (116)
      • Filter-Free Zone (10)
      • For What it's Worth (37)
      • Fostering Change (2)
      • Memo from the Mayor (2)
      • Men Writes (26)
      • Mortgage Tips (1)
      • Seeker Snippets (22)
      • Take Note (6)
      • Which Witch is Witch? (10)
    • Current (397)
      • Appreciating Contemporary Art (3)
      • Discover SD&G (36)
      • Fashionably Marlene (13)
      • From Sharyn's Pantry (7)
      • Gardening – Ask Anna (28)
      • Grant Spills the Gravy (10)
      • Jay's Tech & Cyber Insights (4)
      • Keeping it Reel (27)
      • Local Spins from Bud's Records (9)
      • Louise Mignault (58)
      • Mental Health Matters (11)
      • Out and About (51)
      • Outdoor Club (24)
      • Reality Bytes (8)
      • roadSIGNS (32)
      • Smart Move with Sondra (4)
      • The Resilient Life (5)
      • Transition Cornwall+ (16)
      • What I'm Reading (2)
      • Wondrous Life (34)
      • Yafa Arts & Craft (22)
    • Friends of the Cline House (2)
  • Douris Deliberations (6)
  • Events (1)
  • Health & Fitness (11)
  • Home & Garden (11)
  • Interviews (159)
    • 5 questions with… (106)
    • Business Profiles (2)
    • Locals in the Loupe (49)
  • Leisure & Lifestyle (736)
  • News (2,574)
    • Ontario (1)
  • Politics (24)
    • Federal Elections (10)
    • Provincial Elections (10)
  • Science & Technology (46)
  • Sports (3)
  • The Adventures of D.B Cooper (1)
  • The Soapbox (260)
    • Agree to Disagree (114)
  • This May Also Interest You (1,587)
  • Travel (52)
  • You May Also Like (971)
Facebook Twitter Instagram Youtube TikTok
Don't miss anything!

Get notified of all our new news by ringing the bell at the bottom left corner!

Content Safety

HERO

theseeker.ca

Trustworthy

Approved by Sur.ly

2024
Disclaimers
Stock Photos partially provided by our partner Depositphotos
The Seeker Newspaper is located at 327 Second Street E., Cornwall, ON K6H 1Y8 -- All rights reserved
The Seeker does not accept responsibility for errors, misprints or inaccuracies published within.Please note that the views and opinions expressed in news article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of The Seeker. The content provided is for informational purposes only and has been written from the authors’ perspective, aiming to engage and inform readers. The Seeker is committed to presenting a wide range of viewpoints and encourages readers to conduct their own research and exercise critical thinking when considering these opinions in the context of their own perspectives.
ISSN 2562-1750 (Print)

ISSN 2562-1769 (Online)
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • News
  • The Soapbox
  • Columnists
  • Events
  • Advertise!
    • Online
    • In Print
  • Puzzles
  • Videos

© 2023 Reducing our footprint!   For every issue we print, we plant a tree!

This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this website you are giving consent to cookies being used. Visit our Privacy and Cookie Policy.