A community-oriented approach with a progressive editorial stance, striving for transparency and encouraging readers to consider multiple perspectives.

Thursday, June 19, 2025
booked.netCall us at 613-935-3763
Eco-conscious : Print an issue, plant a tree! 

No products in the cart.

  • About
    • Contributors
    • Disclaimers
    • Terms & Conditions
    • Giving back
    • Mission Statement
    • Past Issues
    • Where to Find
    • Call us at 613-935-3763
The Seeker - Positively Local, Suporting Local
  • Home
  • News
  • The Soapbox
  • Columnists
  • Events
  • Advertise!
    • Online
    • In Print
  • Puzzles
  • Videos
Seeker
No Result
View All Result

Agree to Disagree – Can you refuse entry?

Julia Lucio by Julia Lucio
July 29, 2020
in News, Agree to Disagree, The Soapbox
Reading Time: 4 mins read
0

There are two issues I want to talk about this week: wearing masks at small businesses, and the reopening of schools.

Let’s talk about the first one today.

You might also like

The Ontario SPCA supports more than 60 animals during spay/neuter and wellness event in Akwesasne

TOM GREEN ANNOUNCES NATIONAL TOUR 

City of Cornwall and Cornwall Community Hospital Recognize Stroke Awareness Month

Over the last week, it was brought to my attention that the directive about mask wearing in public spaces is at best ambiguous. We know there are exceptions, and we know that those exceptions are allowed to not wear the mask But does a small business owner have the right to refuse entry to those who claim having an illness, be it physical or mental, that makes it impossible for them to wear said mask? I thought so.k? I thought so.

Reports of individuals circulating the downtown area, demanding to be let into businesses, and claiming that it is an infringement on their Civil Rights to refuse them entry made me want to dig a little further.

The EOHU directive, in its integrity, does not stipulate anything about the subject. However, I found a Q&A page on the EOHU website that said: “No person should be required to provide proof of exemption or turned away from indoor public spaces if unable to wear a mask.” I was baffled. Did that mean a small businesses owner could not refuse entry to a customer not wearing a mask? Clearly not as the Health Unit changed the wording on their site after I sent them a letter asking for clarification.

For my own peace of mind as a business owner, I alos consulted with a lawyer. This is new to everybody and even the law is unclear about the legalities of it all.

But you’ve heard of no shoes, no shirt, no service, right? To me, the same policy should apply to masks.

“Debra”, an Ontario lawyer who prefers to remain unnamed, said that the problems lies in the fact that this could be construed as discrimination. “You can’t refuse entry to someone because they are disabled. This is similar. The laws are new of course. This is unprecedented,” she said.

So could an owner be sued for refusing entry to someone? In theory, yes.

“If someone is disabled and is requesting a reasonable accommodation, they usually have to provide a medical report detailing what they need. Then the store or restaurant owner has to decide if they can accommodate their special needs without undergoing undue hardship,” Debra continued. “If they can, then they must provide the accommodation. If they don’t, the disabled person can file a complaint with the Human Rights Tribunal and claim discrimination on the basis of disability.”

But in this case, we can’t ask for a medical report. Does that mean that you HAVE to let people in? It’s not like letting people in without a mask is something that would require adjustments, repairs or cost an owner anything, right?

Well, not so quick.

“It will cause undue hardship if it is a small business or restaurant, and the staff or patrons will be put at risk. That’s what I would argue,” ended Debra.

“It is a human rights issue,” confirmed Dr. Paul Paul Roumeliotis, our Medical Officer of Health at the Eastern Ontario Health Unit. “But overall an owner has the right to refuse on the grounds of protecting the health and safety of his/staff and clients. We will be clarifying this in our FAQ’s. Note that there are some exceptions: in a situation where, say, the store was the only store in town, then the human rights of the customer would prevail. But where there are other choices of shopping alternatives in the area, within a reasonable distance, then the owner’s rights would prevail,” he ended.

Personally, to cover all bases, if a customer insisted on coming in without a mask claiming I’m infringing on their human rights, I would try to offer an alternate means of service, such as curb side pickup or delivery, to show good will. I am no legal expert, but I think it would show good faith on my part, shall I end up in court.

Because, you know some will try to sue. I am sure we will see such cases pop up in Ontario in the next few months. But I certainly hope the law will get clearer and more defined on the topic as we move along.

No business owner should return to work feeling unsafe. Especially if we have to take the word of people at face value.

Update: We sent in for comments to the Health Unit on Sunday and today, July 29th, we noticed that the information on their website at https://eohu.ca/en/covid/frequently-asked-questions-eohu-directive-for-mandatory-masking-in-enclosed-public-spaces now clearly stipulates that the owner can deny entry. We’re happy to see that this ambiguity has been rectified.

Julia Lucio

Julia Lucio

Julia Lucio is the Managing Editor and Publisher of The Seeker Newsmagazine, and a passionate, unapologetic voice in local media. She writes boldly on politics, social justice, community events, and the everyday moments that shape our lives.

Next Post
Council Snippets – June 24, 2019

Council Meeting Notes - By the Chamber

Categories

  • Business & Finances (15)
  • Columns (626)
    • Archived (115)
      • Filter-Free Zone (9)
      • For What it's Worth (37)
      • Fostering Change (2)
      • Memo from the Mayor (2)
      • Men Writes (26)
      • Mortgage Tips (1)
      • Seeker Snippets (22)
      • Take Note (6)
      • Which Witch is Witch? (10)
    • Current (389)
      • Appreciating Contemporary Art (2)
      • Discover SD&G (36)
      • Fashionably Marlene (13)
      • From Sharyn's Pantry (7)
      • Gardening – Ask Anna (27)
      • Grant Spills the Gravy (10)
      • Jay's Tech & Cyber Insights (4)
      • Keeping it Reel (27)
      • Local Spins from Bud's Records (9)
      • Louise Mignault (58)
      • Mental Health Matters (10)
      • Out and About (51)
      • Outdoor Club (23)
      • Reality Bytes (8)
      • roadSIGNS (31)
      • Smart Move with Sondra (3)
      • The Resilient Life (5)
      • Transition Cornwall+ (16)
      • What I'm Reading (2)
      • Wondrous Life (33)
      • Yafa Arts & Craft (21)
    • Friends of the Cline House (1)
  • Douris Deliberations (6)
  • Events (1)
  • Health & Fitness (10)
  • Home & Garden (11)
  • Interviews (156)
    • 5 questions with… (106)
    • Business Profiles (1)
    • Locals in the Loupe (47)
  • Leisure & Lifestyle (736)
  • News (2,566)
    • Ontario (1)
  • Politics (24)
    • Federal Elections (10)
    • Provincial Elections (10)
  • Science & Technology (46)
  • Sports (3)
  • The Adventures of D.B Cooper (1)
  • The Soapbox (259)
    • Agree to Disagree (114)
  • This May Also Interest You (1,574)
  • Travel (52)
  • You May Also Like (969)
Facebook Twitter Instagram Youtube TikTok
Don't miss anything!

Get notified of all our new news by ringing the bell at the bottom left corner!

Content Safety

HERO

theseeker.ca

Trustworthy

Approved by Sur.ly

2024
Disclaimers
Stock Photos partially provided by our partner Depositphotos
The Seeker Newspaper is located at 327 Second Street E., Cornwall, ON K6H 1Y8 -- All rights reserved
The Seeker does not accept responsibility for errors, misprints or inaccuracies published within.Please note that the views and opinions expressed in news article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of The Seeker. The content provided is for informational purposes only and has been written from the authors’ perspective, aiming to engage and inform readers. The Seeker is committed to presenting a wide range of viewpoints and encourages readers to conduct their own research and exercise critical thinking when considering these opinions in the context of their own perspectives.
ISSN 2562-1750 (Print)

ISSN 2562-1769 (Online)
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • News
  • The Soapbox
  • Columnists
  • Events
  • Advertise!
    • Online
    • In Print
  • Puzzles
  • Videos

© 2023 Reducing our footprint!   For every issue we print, we plant a tree!

This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this website you are giving consent to cookies being used. Visit our Privacy and Cookie Policy.